GPT as a coder (cont.)
As I said there was another part of the test and we want to look deeper at whether Gpt can code something that works. So I gave it another Leetcode problem. It is still fairly simple but it involves charts, and I noticed Gpt is not quite as good with those. Watch what happens...
ChatGpt was a very disappointing coder. I felt very frightened by how deeply it failed, despite claiming to know the solution to the problem. The suggestion it made to not include a class made no sense at all. And the code had simply not worked. It was basically not true that you would not solve that problem yourself. Maybe one could give you some ideas, but there were hints provided (which were supplied to GPT.) I definitely want to tell people if this is a cheap trick for our money.
A little more on the positive side, I built an app with it that allows users to log in, and share photos.
In preparing this article I test other AI app creators I tried base44, Rosebud, and Replit. Replit had not been as advertised. It may have a similar concept to Wix, but is not useful beyond that. I could not create any game with rosebud, it had actually not worked. Base44 built me a game which was not functioning. I worked with it a while to write the code, but obviously I went past the rate limit, and it took another day. It certainly was not described. AI app creation is not here, and they will all delete your app for your chat/submission history, or maybe just for their suggestion. All of the sudden you have a blank screen. So these apps have move past being advice bots, but are not the coders they are purported to be.